SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1999 Supreme(Bom) 933

A.P.SHAH, S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Buildarch & another – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT:---This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeks to challenge letter dated 8-9-1998 addressed by the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India to the Chief Secretary to the State of Maharashtra by the Joint Secretary, Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India issuing clarification with regard to Coastal Regulation Zone Notification dated 19th February, 1991 (for short "CRZ Notification") particularly with regard to Annexure-I, Clause 6(2) CRZ-II of the Regulations.

2. The above notification dated 19-2-1991 has been issued by the Central Government in exercise of power under section 3(1) and 3(2)(v) of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 and Rule 5(3)(d) of the Environment Protection Rules, 1986 declaring coastal stretches as Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) and Regulating Activities in the CRZ. The said CRZ are divided in four categories as set out in Annexure-I to the CRZ Notification. In the present case we are concerned with CRZ-II which is defined in the notification as follows:-

Category-II (CRZ-II): The areas that have already been developed unto or close to the shore line. For this purpose "developed area" is re





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top