2001 Supreme(Bom) 159
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.
Jetu Jacques Taru Lalvani.... Plaintiff.
Versus
Solestrap Industries Pvt. Ltd. others.... Defendants.
Summons for Judgment No. 266 of 1999 in Summary Suit No. 491 of 1999, decided on 20-2-2001.
Advocates appeared :
N.K. Mudnaney, for plaintiff.
Vimadalal i/b. Vimadalal Co., for defendants.
Headnote:Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 37 -Bill of Exchange -Unless bill of exchange is accepted the drawer of such bill of exchange will be in the position of a principal debtor.
Sick Industrial Companies ( Special Provisions ) Act, 1986 - Section 22- Applicability of Section 22- For attracting Section 22, suit for enforcement of guarantee must be in respect of loan or advance to Industrial company. Where the plaintiff discounted certain bills of exchange which were drawn by the first defendant and accept by second defendant and payment was made by first defendant, there was clearly no loan or advance granted to Industrial company, bar under Section 22 will not apply.
2.In part payment of the amount due under the Bill of Exchange dated 3rd October, 1997 in the amount of Rs. 49,98,480/- the Second defendant paid an amount of Rs. 25 lakhs on 9th January, 1998. As on 28th January, 1998, the amounts of Rs. 24,98,480, Rs. 61,48,920/- and Rs. 80,24,620/- were payable by the defendants to the plaintiff. The plaintiff addressed a letter dated 28th January, 1998. The Second defendant by a letter dated 31st January, 1998 confirmed that the aforesaid amounts were due and payable to the plaintiff. Thereafter, the Second defendant on 27th February, 1998 paid the balance of the principal amount due in respect of the Bill of Exchange dated 3rd October, 1997, so that the entire principal amount under the said Bill of Exchange has been paid. In October 1997, the 2nd defendant issued to the plaintiff a further cheque for Rs. 25 lakhs in part payment of the amount due under the Bill of Exchange dated 13th October, 1997. But, the said cheque was also returned as dishonoured upon presentation. On 7th March, 1998, the Second defendant paid an amount of Rs. 25 lakhs against the said Bill of Exchange, leaving as balance a sum of Rs. 36,48,920/-. By letters dated 24th March, 1998 and 18th April, 1998, the Second defendant assured that a payment schedule would be worked out to pay the outstanding dues of the plaintiff.
3.In so far as the Second defendant is concerned, it has been stated that on the letter of the plaintiff dated 8th December, 1998, the Second defendant had by an endorsement confirmed that an amount of Rs. 1,51,25,844 was due payable to the plaintiff.
4.In para 24 of the plaint, the claim for interest in so far as the First defendant is concerned, is restricted to interest at the rate of 18% per annum, since for the period subsequent to 8th December, 1998, there has been no confirmation as such of the amount which is due and payable. The claim at the rate of 18% per annum has been made on the basis of section 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
5.The claim in the Summary Suit is for the payment of an amount of Rs. 1,39,69,099/- comprised of the principal amount of Rs. 1,16,73,540/- with interest the