SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 79

UPASANI PRATIBHA
Popatlal Jethabhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - Dr. PRATIBHA UPASANI, J.:---This Criminal Revision Application is filed by the applicant/accused Popatlal Jethabhai Shah, being aggrieved by the order dated 8-11-2000 passed by the III Addl. Sessions Judge, Kalyan, whereby his application for recalling of all seven prosecution witnesses for further cross-examination was rejected by him.

2. The accused is facing trial for offence punishable under section 376 of I.P.C. It appears from the proceedings that all the seven prosecution witnesses have been examined. Their cross-examination is over. At this stage, the accused made an application dated 28-1-2000 praying for recalling of all the prosecution witnesses for further cross-examination whose deposition was already over. It was contended in the said application that the Advocate Mr. Kotwal, whom the accused himself had appointed as per his own choice to represent him, could not cross-examine the prosecution witnesses effectively and certain material contradictions remained to be brought on record. It was stated that in the absence of certain material, which has remained to be brought on record, case of accused would be seriously prejudiced and therefore, he be permitted











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top