UPASANI PRATIBHA
Popatlal Jethabhai Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. The accused is facing trial for offence punishable under section 376 of I.P.C. It appears from the proceedings that all the seven prosecution witnesses have been examined. Their cross-examination is over. At this stage, the accused made an application dated 28-1-2000 praying for recalling of all the prosecution witnesses for further cross-examination whose deposition was already over. It was contended in the said application that the Advocate Mr. Kotwal, whom the accused himself had appointed as per his own choice to represent him, could not cross-examine the prosecution witnesses effectively and certain material contradictions remained to be brought on record. It was stated that in the absence of certain material, which has remained to be brought on record, case of accused would be seriously prejudiced and therefore, he be permitted
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.