SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 76

A.M.KHANWILKAR
Mahibubi Abdul Aziz & others – Appellant
Versus
Sayed Abdul Majid & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.:---This writ petition takes exception to the order passed by the Joint Civil Judge, J.D., Pune dated 24-11-1992 in Regular Civil Suit No. 1447 of 1989.

2. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 instituted a suit in the Court of the Civil Judge, J.D., Pune being Regular Civil Suit No. 1447 of 1989, inter alia, praying for a declaration that the suit property is owned by Yasin Zuk Darga and Kabrastan and is not a private property of the petitioners herein.

3. It is not necessary to refer to all the events mentioned in the said suit, for the same are not relevant for the adjudication of the present case. The relevant facts for deciding this petition are that the matter went right upto the Apex Court against the interlocutory order where the Apex Court by order dated 30-7-1991 in Civil Appeal Nos. 3027 and 3028 of 1991 directed the trial Court to deal with the question of jurisdiction as a preliminary issue, if warranted by the pleadings, and dispose of the matter as urgently as possible.

4. After the above said directions, the trial Court framed preliminary issue which reads thus :

"Whether this Court has jurisdiction to try and entertain the present suit?"

5. At this s
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top