A.M.KHANWILKAR
Ganpat Shankar Waghmare – Appellant
Versus
Anjalibai Rao Waghmare (Smt. ) & another – Respondent
2. Petitioner filed an application before the lower Court being Exh. 41 praying for permission to cross examine the plaintiff. The said application was opposed by the respondent plaintiff mainly on the ground that the Court has already struck out the defence of the petitioner by passing an order below Exh. 28 dated 24-10-1991 in exercise of powers under Rule 11 of Order 39 and therefore it is not open to the petitioner to insist for permitting him to cross examine the respondent plaintiff. The Court below accepted the said objection on behalf of the respondent and concluded that since the defence of the petitioner has been struck of by virtue of provisions under Rule 11 Order 39 of C.P.C., it amounts to striking out defence of the defendant in all respects and matter should proceed ex parte against him and he has got no right to cross examine the plaintiffs witness.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that striking of the defence w
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.