B.H.MARLAPALLE, N.J.PANDYA
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Rustom Franroze Hakim (Dr. ) – Respondent
2. The prosecution case unfolds thus :---
The accused Dr. Rustom Franroze Hakim, was a registered medical practitioner with his dispensary at Lemington Road, Bombay-7 and he was a panel doctor under the Employees State Insurance Scheme (E.S.I. Scheme for short). He was an Insurance Medical Officer as defined under Rule 2(n) of the Employees State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950. The complainant Shashikant was an insured person covered under the E.S.I. Scheme and he had registered his card with the accused. The complainant was entitled to free medical treatment and for the reimbursement of medical benefits. It was alleged that on 27-2-82 the complainant went to the dispensary of the accused as he was not feeling well, the accused examined him and gave an injection and charged Rs. 8/- for his treatment. The
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.