SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 276

R.M.LODHA, D.B.BHOSALE
Group Captain A. S. Gangoli & others – Appellant
Versus
Union of India & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---By means of this writ petition, the petitioners seek to impugn the Note 1 appended to para 5 of the respondents's decision contained in letter dated 30-10-1987(Exh.C) annexed with writ petition as being violative of the Article 14 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners have further prayed that the respondent be directed to grant to the petitioners the weightage of 7 years while computing their pension and weightage of 5 years while computing their retirement gratuity. The petitioners have also claimed for interest on delayed payment of due pensionary and gratuity amount.

2. The petitioners were employed in Indian Air Force (in short 'IAF') as Group Captains, Wing Commanders etc. and put in about 20/25 years of service. It is the case of the petitioners that the respondent devised the scheme to solve the problem of shortage of junior ranks and a surplus in the middle seniority bracket of large number of officers, whereby the Public Sector undertakings could approach the IAF for release of surplus officers. For the purpose of Vayudoot Ltd. (Public Sector Undertaking), it is the case of the petitioners that IAF encouraged them and other officers to a





































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top