SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 330

D.B.BHOSALE, R.M.LODHA
Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---By the order dated 5-5-1989 the respondent No. 2 ordered reversion of the petitioner to the post of Junior Engineer (C) since it was found that the petitioner was wrongfully promoted to the post of Assistant Engineer (C) against the quota reserved for B.C. Communities vide order dated 23-9-1987. This office order dated 5-5-1989 is impugned by the petitioner in the present writ petition.

2. Mr. Mendadkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, urged that the petitioner was born in Maharashtra and the question whether he is migrant from Madhya Pradesh was not open to be decided by the employer, but could only have been determined by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims (For short "the Scrutiny Committee") and unless that claim was determined holding that the petitioner was not Schedule Tribe (S.T.) the order or reversion could not have been passed. In support of his arguments, the learned Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of Apex Court in (Kumari Madhuri Patil and another v. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development and others)1, 1995(2) Bom.C.R. (S.C.)690, another judgment of the Apex Court in (Union of India othe




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top