D.B.BHOSALE, R.M.LODHA
Sudhakar Vithal Kumbhare – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra and others – Respondent
2. Mr. Mendadkar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, urged that the petitioner was born in Maharashtra and the question whether he is migrant from Madhya Pradesh was not open to be decided by the employer, but could only have been determined by the Committee for Scrutiny and Verification of Tribe Claims (For short "the Scrutiny Committee") and unless that claim was determined holding that the petitioner was not Schedule Tribe (S.T.) the order or reversion could not have been passed. In support of his arguments, the learned Counsel for the petitioner relied upon the judgment of Apex Court in (Kumari Madhuri Patil and another v. Additional Commissioner, Tribal Development and others)1, 1995(2) Bom.C.R. (S.C.)690, another judgment of the Apex Court in (Union of India othe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.