SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 326

D.K.DESHMUKH
Mohammad Salam Anamul Haque – Appellant
Versus
S. A. Azmi and others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.K. DESHMUKH, J.:---This petition has been filed under section 10 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 alleging that the respondents have wilfully committed breach of the order dated 16-10-1995 passed by the School Tribunal, Nasik region, Nasik in Appeal No. 22 of 1993 filed by the petitioner.

2. The facts that are material and relevant for the present purpose are that, according to the petitioner he was in service of the respondent No. 3/school since 1990. His services were terminated on 30th April, 1993 by the management. Therefore, he filed an appeal before the School Tribunal under section 9 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 (herein after referred to as the "Act"). Some other employees of the respondent No. 3, whose services were also terminated had also filed appeals. Their appeals were registered as Appeal No. 21/93 and Appeal No. 23/93. All these three appeals namely Appeal No. 21 of 1993, No. 22 of 1993 and Appeal No. 23 of 1993 filed by the petitioner were decided by the School Tribunal by its order dated 16-10-1995. All the three appeals were allowed. The management was directed to reinstate all the thre











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top