JUDGMENT -` R.K. BATTA, J.:---These revisions arise out of the same incident of which the applicants were tried in one trial. The applicants were convicted for the offence under section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). Applicant Maroti was sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs. 300.00 in default, Rigorous Imprisonment for one month. Applicants Purushottam and Pandurang were sentenced to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs. 1000.00, in default, to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 days. Anjanabai, who was accused No. 2 before the trial Court, was also held guilty for the offence under section 4 of the said Act and was sentenced to imprisonment till rising of the Court and to pay fine of Rs. 1000.00, in default, simple Imprisonment for 2 days. All the applicants as also Anjanabai preferred appeal before the Sessions Court, Amravati, but their appeal was dismissed. The applicants now challenge the concurrent findings of two courts below by filing this revision. Accused Anjanabai has not filed any revision.

2. Arguments were heard. Shri Dubey, learned Advocate argued on behalf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document