SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 836

D.G.DESHPANDE
Kishore Narsingh alias Hirala Shah & others – Appellant
Versus
Prakash Narsingh Shah & others – Respondent


Judgment

D.G. DESHPANDE, J.:---The plaintiffs are the children of one Sushilabai and they have filed the suit for declaration that they are the members of Joint Hindu Undivided family of late Narsingh alias Hiralal Shah, who was their father and for share in his property and for other incidental reliefs.

2. The case of the plaintiffs in short is that deceased Sushilabai Shah was the second wife of Narsingh Shah who was also known as alias Hiralal Shah, and the defendants are the children of the first wife of Narsingh Shah from the deceased Smt. Banubai. According to the plaintiffs after the death of Narsingh Shah they have become entitled to a share in his property being the legal heirs. Narsingh Shah died in 1953 but he was married to Sushilabai in 1935 and till his death Narsingh Shah was paying maintenance to Sushilabai and after Narsingh Shah Banubai paid the maintenance and after her death the defendants paid the maintenance but since the defendants suddenly stopped paying maintenance, they have constantly filed a suit for declaration and other reliefs.

3. Defendants have on the other hand totally and completely denied the case of the plaintiffs. They have denied that Sushilabai









































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top