SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 573

R.M.LODHA
Kashinath Shankar Gambhire – Appellant
Versus
Sudha Gopal Patil (Sou. ) & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---The petitioner who has suffered decree for eviction for causing nuisance and annoyance to the landlord and neighbouring occupiers at the hands of the courts below has preferred this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. The respondent Nos. 1 to 3 herein are original plaintiffs and they filed suit for eviction against the petitioner (original defendant). The eviction was sought on two grounds viz., (i) that the suit premises were in dilapidated condition and it was dangerous for the personal safety and the safety of the property and since the local authority has directed the landlord to demolish the said building, the premises are required under section 13(1)(hh) of the Bombay Rent Control Act and (ii) that the defendant was guilty of causing nuisance to the adjoining occupiers of the suit premises. The suit was contested by the defendant and after recording the evidence, the trial Court negatived plaintiffs' case for eviction under section 13(1)(hh) but granted the decree for eviction under section 13(1)(c) that is the defendant was guilty of causing nuisance to the adjoining occupiers. The defendant preferred appeal but was unsucc











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top