SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 772

G.D.PATIL, R.M.LODHA
Jigar Harish Shah – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - G.D. Patil, J.:---Rule made returnable forthwith. Mr. Mehta, learned Counsel for respondent No. 1 waives service. The learned A.P.P. waives service for respondent No. 2 - State. Heard by consent.

2. By the instant petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction against respondent No. 1 for rectifying the mistake allegedly committed by the Passport Authority in relation to mentioning his date of birth as 2-7-1979 as against his correct date of birth 2-10-1979 in the passport issued to the petitioner.

3. The petitioner had made an application to the Passport authority for recording his correct date of birth in the passport making amendment in the passport. The Passport Authority appears to have declined to do so, unless the petitioner produces a declaratory order in that regard from the First Class Judicial Magistrate. The petitioner thereupon had approached the Metropolitan Magistrate, 30th Court, Kurla, Mumbai seeking such a declaration. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate by his Order dated 23-2-2000 disposed of the petitioner's application; on coming to the conclusion that the Court was having no jurisdiction in this regard. It is in these circumstances the petitioner





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top