G.D.PATIL, A.M.KHANWILKAR
Naseem Imran Mohammed Siddik (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent
2. Although three grounds were pressed at the time of arguments, we would rest our judgment only on one ground, which, in our view, is good enough to quash and set aside the impugned detention order. The impugned detention order has been assailed before us mainly on the following three grounds viz., (i) that there is enormous and unexplained delay in execution of the detention order which has inevitably affected the genuineness of the detention order; (ii) that the detention order suffers from the vice of non application of mind inasmuch as the residential address of the detenu mentioned in the impugned or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.