SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 569

D.G.DESHPANDE
Yashim Rao Karkaria – Appellant
Versus
Cyrus Edul Karkaria – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.G. DESHPANDE, J.:---The suit is filed by both wife-plaintiff No. 1 and husband-plaintiff No. 2 for divorce by mutual consent under section 32-B of the Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936. The matter was on board today under caption "Mutual consent matters". Both the plaintiff No. 1 and plaintiff No. 2 are residing in United States and the plaint which was filed in this Court on 13th July, 2000 has been signed by both the plaintiffs and it was presented by the constituted attorney, who is an Advocate. The original power of attorney duly signed and attested by both the parties is filed on record. It is notarised by Notary Public in USA.

2. Counsel representing both the plaintiffs also tendered today affidavit of the wife-plaintiff No. 1 and the husband-plaintiff No. 2. Both these affidavits are also notarised before the Notary Public in USA, and each of the affidavit is accompanied by letter written by the plaintiff No. 1 or plaintiff No. 2 explaining difficulty in coming to India for the purpose of giving evidence. Both of them have however stated in the affidavits why they have filed this suit for divorce by mutual consent, and affidavits being accepted and taken on re




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top