SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 605

R.J.KOCHAR
Sudeshkumari alias Santoshkumari Roshanlal Agarwal of M/s. Rockline Construction Co. – Appellant
Versus
Bombay Alloy Steel Industries Pvt. Ltd. & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.J. KOCHAR, J.:---The present Chamber Summons has been taken out on behalf of the plaintiff for two prayers. The first prayer is to allow the plaintiff to amend the plaint as per schedule of amendment annexed to the Chamber Summons as "A". The plaintiff is seeking to add in the title of the plaint, notice of motion and all other proceedings, the name of Narinder Gupta as Plaintiff No. 2. He has also prayed for all the necessary consequential amendments in the proceedings. The amendments are of formal nature and there was no serious objection raised on behalf of the defendants. The Chamber Summons is therefore made absolute in terms of prayer Clause (b). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks from today.

2. The defendants have seriously contested the second prayer in the Chamber Summons that is the prayer for appointment of a Court Receiver of the suit property described in Exhibit-A to the plaint in the above suit with all the powers under Order XL, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 and also with power to take possession of the portion duly vacated by the Central Warehousing Corporation as described in the affidavit in support of the Chamber Summons.

3. I







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top