A.P.SHAH, P.V.KAKADE
Asha Krishinlall Bajaj (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Sub-Registrar of Assurances and others – Respondent
2. We have heard the learned Counsel for both sides. Perused the record. The facts giving rise to the dispute, in brief, are thus:---
The husband of the petitioner was owner of flat No. 53 bearing City Survey No. 3727 admeasuring 511 sq. yards situated in Kansai section, Ambernath (E), Dist. Thane, together with house constructed thereon. The husband of the petitioner died intestate leaving behind the petitioner, a son and a married daughter. The son and the married daughter are well established in life and, therefore, were not interested in the property and thus wanted release of their respective 1/3 share in favour of the petitioner in the aforesaid property.
The petitioner's son as well as daughter executed a deed of release on Rs. 100/- stamp paper as required by Art. 52 of Schedule-I of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.