SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 558

J.N.PATEL, P.S.BRAHME
Manohar Kisan Maraskolhe – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Per J.N. PATEL, J.:---Heard Mr. Daga and Ms. Kalsi, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mr. Thakre, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/State.

2. The appellant is challenging his conviction and sentence in Sessions Trial No. 80/1990 by the 10th Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, who found the appellant guilty of having committed an offence under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to suffer imprisonment for life, by his judgment and order dated 25-9-1992.

3. The appellant was married to deceased Durgabai and they were residing at village Sawangi. On 28-9-1989 at about 1.30 p.m., the accused along with his wife Durgabai returned from weekly bazar. At that time, the accused was holding a stick in his hand and had assaulted his wife on her waist as she did not give him money for weekly bazar. On being assaulted. Durgabai ran towards her house followed by the accused. Inside the house, the accused forcibly administered 'endrin' an orgono phosphorus used as insecticide. Immediately thereafter Durgabai came out of the house and started shouting that her husband administered her endrin and she should be saved. When the accused followed her, she ran t
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top