SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 989

V.C.DAGA
Krishna Kashinath Patil – Appellant
Versus
S. Mohandas Kamath – Respondent


JUDGMENT- V.C. DAGA, J.:---This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 17-11-1990, passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, in Civil Appeal No. 101 of 1989, confirming the order passed below Exhibit 1 in Regular, Darkhast No. 1 of 1985 dated 25th January, 1989 by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vasai, whereby Darkhast Application No. 1 of 1985 was dismissed holding it to be not maintainable.

FACTS

2. The facts giving rise to the present petition in nutshell are as under:-

The petitioner is a landlord of the plot of land situate at Agashi, Taluka Vasai, District Thane. There was a structure standing on the said piece of land, bearing house No. 185. The same has been in possession of the respondent as tenant on monthly rent of Rs. 15/-. The suit premises is governed by provisions of the Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 ("Bombay Rent Act" for short).

3. The petitioner herein had filed Regular Civil Suit No. 2 of 1970, in the Court of Civil Judge, Junior Division, Vasai, against the respondent-tenant on the following grounds:

(1) that the premises was being used for the purpose other than for whic

























































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top