JUDGMENT - R.K. BATTA, J.:---The applicant husband (herein after referred as original non-applicant) has approached this Court against judgment dated 25-9-1998, in which he was directed to pay maintenance of Rs. 300/- per month from the date of application i.e. 24-5-1994 to the present respondent (herein after referred as original applicant).

2. The original applicant had filed application for maintenance for self and for her son. The trial Court, on the basis of evidence, came to the conclusion that the original applicant had failed to prove neglect and refusal on the part of the original non-applicant to maintain the original applicant and she was staying at her parents house on her own.

3. The revisional Court, however, came to the conclusion that there was sufficient evidence to indicate that the original non-applicant had not only refused and neglected to maintain the original applicant without sufficient cause, but the original applicant had been subjected to ill-treatment on account of demand for money as a result of which she had justifiable reason to leave the house of the original non-applicant.

4. Learned Advocate for the original non-applicant has argued before me that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document