SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 248

A.B.NAIK
Bishansing Thakursing – Appellant
Versus
Nasira Kadar Shaikh & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - NAIK A.B., J.:---The First Appeal Nos. 153 and 156 of 1984 can be disposed of by the common judgment as this relates to the accident which took place on 14-4-1978. The facts involved in these appeals are very short and they can be stated in brief:

An Ambassador car bearing Registration No. MRH 9829 belonging to the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation was coming from Nanded to Aurangabad. The said car was being driven by Kadar Shaikh who was in employment of M.I.D.C. The occupant of the car namely Moreshwar Karmarkar and Govind Kulkarni, were also in service of M.I.D.C. as Executive Engineer and Superintendent Engineer respectively. The Ambassador car was proceeding towards Aurangabad from Nanded. A Truck bearing Registration No. MHT 5687 owned by the present appellant was being driven by the respondent No. 5 i.e. Karnalsingh. The said truck was proceeding to Hyderabad from Bhavnagar. The accident took place on Nanded-Basmat-Aurangabad road near 426/600 kilometer stone. The place of accident is 25 km. from Nanded. It is the case of the claimants that the truck was being driven by Karnalsingh gave dash to the said car by which all the three occupants of the car








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top