JUDGMENT - Smt. NISHITA MHATRE, J.---Through this writ petition, the petitioner has impugned the order of the Industrial Court passed in a complaint filed under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

2. A few facts of the case in brief are as follows :

The respondent-workman joined Duke Sons in 1983. He was appointed as an Assistant in Sales Department. He was later working as a Sales Co-ordinator. In 1994, the petitioner-company took over the business of Duke Sons. Some persons employed with the petitioner accepted the Voluntary Retirement Scheme offered to them. The respondent was also offered this scheme, but did not accept the same. The respondent received salary inclusive of Dearness Allowance and other allowances. Some time in December, 1994, the respondent availed of leave of 15 days i.e. 5 days in January, 1994 and 10 days in February 1995. The respondent was issued a show-cause notice and he informed the petitioner that he had to attend to his ailing mother and, therefore, was unable to attend to duty. His leave of absence was then adjusted and the respondent received full wages for the m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document