SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 805

NISHITA MHATRE, R.M.LODHA
Saroj Iyer and another – Appellant
Versus
Maharashtra Medical Council of Indian Medicine and another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M. LODHA, J.:---These two writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment as common issues are involved therein and principal prayer is identical for issuance of direction to the Maharashtra Medical Council of Indian Medicines from preventing the members of the public in general and the petitioners in particular from attending the enquiries held under section 22 of the Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965.

2. For the sake of convenience we intend to refer to the facts of Writ Petition No. 493 of 1990. The first petitioner in this writ petition is a journalist employed in the Times of India and she has filed the petition in her capacity as Journalist as well as in public interest. The second petitioner Medico Friends Circle is a registered society and trust. The first respondent is the Maharashtra Medical Council of Indian Medicine, statutory body established under section 3 of Maharashtra Medical Council Act, 1965 (for short 'Act of 1965') and the second respondent is the State of Maharashtra. The first petitioner claims to have interest in socio-medical issues and has published some articles in that regard. Both the petitioners cl






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top