SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 888

A.P.SHAH, RANJANA DESAI
Uttam T. Dhumal & others – Appellant
Versus
Regional Transport Authority, Pune & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - P.C.:---We have heard the learned Counsel for the appellants, learned Advocate General for State and the learned Counsel appearing for Pune Municipal Corporation. We have also perused the record of the case including the impugned order of the learned Single Judge.

2. The appellants are the owners of what are known as Six Seater Auto Rickshaws, who were earlier allowed to ply within the entire limits of Pune Municipal Corporation. They are all holders of individual contract carriage permits issued by the respondent No. 1 Regional Transport Authority (RTA). The appellants have impugned before the learned Single Judge the decision taken by the State Transport Authority (STA) on 9-6-1998 to restrict the plying of 6 + 1 Seater Auto Rickshaws outside all Municipal Corporation areas so that they do not ply within the city corporation limits. Certain other incidental directions were also given by the STA.

3. Pursuant to the communication by the STA, the RTA Pune in its meeting held on 5-2-1999 took a decision to allow Six Seater Autorickshaw permit holders to ply their vehicles outside the erstwhile limits of Pune and Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation in the rest of the Pune












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top