SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 696

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
(NAGPUR BENCH)
J.N. Patel P.V. Hardas, JJ.
Surendra s/o Ramchandra Taori.... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra through its Secretary,
Dept. of Home, Mantralaya others.... Respondents.
Criminal Writ Petition No. 312 of 1999, decided on 27-7-2001.
Advocates appeared :
P.B. Patil, for petitioner.
Bhushan Gavai, P.P. with K.S. Dhote, A.P.P., for respondents.

Headnote:(i) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 110 - Security for keeping peace and for good behaviour - Proceedings are taken to prevent commission of such acts - Provision confers drastic power, which should be used with extreme caution - Passing of preliminary order under Section 111, Cr. P.C. is a condition precedent for taking further steps - No final step in proceedings can be made without giving an opportunity to such person to show cause. (Paras 12 and 13)

       (ii) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Section 110-Petitioner was arrested under and produced before Special Magistrate and was sent to judicial custody as he could not produce sureties - Petitioner was brought to police station, given beating, causing serious injuries Magistrate failed to follow the procedure as contemplated under Section 111, Cr. P.C. - Order also did not conform to requirements of Section 116(3), Cr. P.C. - Impugned order was without application of mind and by ignoring due process of law - Detention of petitioner has to be held to be illegal and in violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India. (Paras 8, 10 and 13)

       (iii) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 21 - Power of Special Executive Magistrate conferred in an officer of rank of Police Inspector - Vesting of such power in police officers of whatever rank had resulted in blatant misuse of such power to the detriment of fundamental right of citizen - Judicial notice of survey conducted in jails - Powers under Sections 108 to 110 and 145 and 147, Cr. P.C. recommended to be made over to Judicial Magistrate of First Class. (Para 10)

       (iv) Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226 - Illegal detention of petitioner in exercise of power under Section 110, Cr. P.C. - Petitioner tortured in judicial custody Compensation of Rs. 15,000/- awarded for custodial torture and illegal detention with cost Rs. 5,000/- State directed to take suitable action against guilty police officials. (Para 20)

JUDGMENT - J.N. PATEL, J.:---The petitioner, who is a journalist and working as reporter of Daily Hindusthan published from Amravati, is a resident of Malkapur town in Buldana district. The petitioner was required to invoke the extraordinary jurisdiction of this Court by filing the petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India as he came to be arrested and detained in custody under the impugned order passed by the respondent No. 2-Special Executive Magistrate and Police Inspector, Local Crime Branch, Buldana, District Buldana on 23-10-1999 in a proceedings initiated under Chapter VIII of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that, as a journalist, he exposed the police machinery of Malkapur Police Station on having taken up some matters criticising the mal-practice and high handedness of the police personnel. One of such matter was relating to sensational murder case in Malkapur town which occurred in the month of September 1999. It is the case of the petitioner that, annoyed by such publications, the respondent Nos. 3 to 6 started harassing the petitioner and also booked him in a false case. On 24-9-1999, the petitioner was threatened by respondent No. 4 Shri S.M. Jagdale, Police Sub-Inspector and, therefore, the petitioner approached City Police Station, Malkapur for lodging a complaint, but his complaint was not accepted and therefore he forwarded the complaint to the S.D.P.O., Malkapur and forwarded copies of the same to the authorities. The petitioner expressed that there was eminent danger to his life and personal liberty as he has been threatened by respondent No. 4. Instead of taking cognizance of the complaint, the respondents police officials, out of vengeance, accosted the petitioner on 24-10-1999 at 10.30 p.m., when he was going to visit his relative, on his way. The respondent No. 6, Police Constable Baban Sangade, along with the Police Officers who are joined as respondent No. 3 to 5 mercilessly beaten the petitioner in Police Station, Rural, where respondent No. 6 Baban Sangade is attached and posted, because of which the petitioner suffered injury to his right eye and other parts of the body. According to the petitioner, it is respondent No. 6 Baban Sangade who accosted the petitioner while he was going to visit his relative on his vehicle at Harikiran Society, Malkapur and brought the petitioner to Police Station, Rural, Malkapur and informed respondent Nos. 3 to 5 on telephone and it is in the Police Station, Rural that all these persons mercilessly assaulted the petitioner. In support of his contention, the petitioner has placed on record photograph at Annexure 'C' and 'A-1'. It is the case of the petitioner that while assaulting the petitioner, he was threatened by respondent Nos. 3 to 6 that if he does not stop giving news against them, they will not leave him alive. Thereafter the petitioner was taken to City Police Station and there again respondent Nos. 3 to 6 along with the other staff on duty, assaulted the petitioner and he was detained in lock up. Thereafter the petitioner was taken for medical check up to Medical Officer of Cottage Hospital, Malkapur who advised to take the petitioner to Buldana for immediate medical treatment. But, instead of doing so, the petitioner was brought back to Police Station and by threat and under duress, obtained in writing that the petitioner wants to take medical treatment in private hospital and the petitioner was released.

3. It is submitted by the petitioner that a false complaint came to be registered against the petitioner for having committed an offence under section 353 of the Indian Penal Code and so on and that the petitioner was illegally detained on summoning him to the Police Station on the pretext of taking him to Buldana hospital for further medical treatment (Annexure 'D'). The petitioner came to be produced before the Special Executive Magistrate (respondent No. 2) on 23-10-1999, who is a Police I




































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top