JUDGMENT - P.S. BRAHME, J.:---Through this writ petition preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner detenu has impugned the detention order dated 11th September, 2001 passed by the second respondent- the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, under sub-section (1) of section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 (Amendment of 1996) (Maharashtra Act No. L.V. of 1981).

2. The detention order along with the grounds of detention dated 11th September, 2001, was served on the detenu on 9-10-2001 and their true copies are annexed as Annexures I and II respectively to this writ petition.

3. We have heard the learned Counsel for the parties. Mr. Jaiswal, the learned Counsel for the petitioner though raised several grounds running from (A) to (T) in the petition, he pressed in service only one ground mentioned in para (I) of the petition.

4. Ground I- The petitioner submits that the petitioner has been released on bail and order of bail passed with certain conditions, further order of P.C.R. and M.C.R. Though these are vital and material documents, the same are not filed (bail a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document