D.S.ZOTING
Atlaz Degi-Tel Pvt. Ltd. and others – Appellant
Versus
Atlaz Technology Pvt. Ltd. and another – Respondent
2. Heard Mr. D.G. Aras, Advocate, holding for Mr. A.D. Shinde, learned Counsel for the petitioners, Mr. A.P. Mundargi, learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mrs. J.P. Akolkar, learned A.P.P. for the respondent No. 2-State.
3. In Criminal Writ Petition No. 27/2001, Rule has already been issued.
Rule in Cri.W.P. Nos. 123/2001, 124/2001 125/2001. With consent of the parties, rule is made returnable forthwith.
4. The above petitions have been filed by the original accused. They pray this Court to invoke powers under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as well as inherent powers under section 482 of Cri.P.C. for the purpose of quashing complaints in Criminal Case Nos. 1572/2000, 1218/1999, 1685/2000 and 2625/2000; filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Facts relevant for decision of these petitions may be summarized as under:
5. The petitioners are the original accused in the above referred crimin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.