SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 714

A.B.NAIK
Balaji son of Bhikaji Kapale & another – Appellant
Versus
Punjaji son of Balaji Tayade & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.B. NAIK, J.:---Rule. Rule taken up for final hearing with the consent of the parties.

2. A short, but important question is raised in this petition filed by the petitioners is "Whether the Asstt. Charity Commissioner has jurisdiction to entertain an application to set aside ex-parte order passed by him in the enquiry under section 22 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act?"

3. In order to appreciate the above said question, it is necessary to refer the facts which emerge from the record. The Trust, by name "Jijamata Shikshan Sanstha, Sindhkhedraja, having No. PTR F-38(BLD) (hereinafter referred to as "Trust") is registered under the provisions of the Bombay Public Trusts Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"). According to the Rules Regulations of the Trust, the Trust is managed by the Managing Committee, and the members of the Managing Committee are to be elected by the members of the Trust as per the provisions of Rules and Regulations. It is revealed from record that there are two groups in the Trust claiming to be in-charge of the management of the Trust. As no elections were held for a considerable time, there was an occasion for the Asstt. Charity Commissioner to p





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top