SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 459

F.I.REBELLO
Suraj Sanghi Finance Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Credential Finance Ltd. & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - REBELLO F.I., J.:---It is the case of the plaintiffs that they had granted an intercorporate loan to defendant No. 1 which was acknowledged by receipt dated 29-10-1996. The said loan was secured by personal guarantee of defendant No. 2. The intercorporate loan was thereafter acknowledged on several occasions. The documents form part of annexure to the plaint. By way of secured payments, defendants had pledged shares and had also issued cheques. It is the case of the plaintiff that when the cheques were deposited, they were dishonoured. Suit is filed under Order 37 of C.P.C. Receipt shows interest payable at the rate of 28.15% per annum.

2. On summons for judgment being taken out, defendants have put in their appearance. Affidavit has been filed by one Deepak, Managing Director of the defendant. I need not advert to the various averments in the affidavit as at the hearing of the summons for judgment, on behalf of the defendants, it is principally contended as under:

(a) That the suit as filed is not maintainable as summary suit as the plaintiffs had security by way of pledged shares. Once there was security, the plaintiffs could have filed suit only on return of security






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top