P.V.KAKADE
Board of Trustees of the Port of Mumbai – Appellant
Versus
Suryabhan Popat Londhe – Respondent
2. I have heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners. None present for the respondent. It may also be noted that none was present for the respondent on the last occasion also when the matter came up for hearing on 3rd February, 2000.
3. The facts involved in the dispute, in brief, are thus :-
The respondent workman Shri Londhe joined the services of the petitioners Bombay Port Trust on 30th July, 1997. At the time of his involvement in the incident i.e. 8th July, 1985, the respondent was working as scavenger and his duty was to clean the assigned area within the docks. The case of the petitioners is that on the said date the respondents reported for duty at 6.30 a.m. and started doing the cleansing work along with other scavengers. At about 9.00 a.m. one clerk Mr. Warule noticed tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.