ORAL JUDGMENT:---With consent of the Counsel appearing for the litigating parties and as a very short point arises for adjudication, we are disposing this writ petition at this stage finally.

2. Rule, returnable forthwith with the consent of both the parties.

3. RRC is under execution and that RRC is engulfing the personal property of the petitioner who happens to be one of the directors of M/s. Arihant Agro Products Limited. On 1-12-2000 a notice was given by District Collector/Tehsildar, Government Dues Recovery, District Mumbai to M/s. Arihant Agro Products Ltd., informing them the claim made by Deputy Commissioner, Hyderabad Division, C.S. No. and District Collector No. as per the books of the District Collector the land belonging to Mr. Saumil D. Mehta was to be attached and the revenue due and payable and till date has not been so paid for the years 1988-89 to 1992-93 which is to the tune of a sum of Rs. 22,30,316.00 paise and a notice fee of Rs. 2.00 paise aggregating to Rs. 22,30,318.00 paise ought to be paid by said M/s. Arihant Agro Products Ltd., and petitioner Saumil D. Mehta. The office of the District Collector/Tahsildar, Government Dues Recovery, informed by the said

Click Here to Read the rest of this document