SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 688

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Nalini w/o Onkar Patil (Smt. ) – Appellant
Versus
Girdhar s/o Kashinath Patil & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.:---The petition arises from the judgment and order dated 31st December, 1999 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nashik allowing the revision application filed by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 against the order of the Additional Collector, Jalgaon dated 19th January, 1999. The Additional Collector, Jalgaon in RTS Appeal No. 56/98, by the said order of 19th January, 1999, had allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Bhusawal dated 6th April, 1998. The said Sub- Divisional Officer, Bhusawal by his order dated 6th April, 1998 in RTS Revision No. 47/97 had rejected the revision application filed by the petitioner against the mutation of Entry No. 1319 and other mutation entries carried out by the Talathi of village Rajore on 27th July, 1995 pursuant to application stated to have been filed by one Onkar Patil.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that Onkar Pandurang Patil was her husband and he had purchased agricultural land being Gut No. 205 admeasuring 46 acres in the village of Rajore by a deed dated 5th February, 1979 for a consideration of Rs. 9000/-. Pursuant to the purchase of the property, mut
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top