Key Points: - The judgment emphasizes that mutation of entries under section 149 requires lawful, stamped, and registered documents to convey rights to immovable property worth Rs. 100/- and above. [4000137270004][4000137270011] - It holds that the Talathi must insist on documentary evidence supporting the acquisition of rights before mutation, and that intimation from registering authorities under section 154 is mandatory; mutations based on mere applications without proper documents are vulnerable to being quashed. [4000137270004][4000137270010][4000137270011] - The court quashed mutation entry 1319 and restored the original entry 1086 in favor of Onkar Patil, reinforcing that entries have presumptive value but must be supported by valid documentary evidence; unverified or fabricated applications cannot justify mutation. (!) [4000137270015][4000137270012] - It cites that Section 157 provides that entries in the record of rights and certified mutation entries are presumed true until contradicted, underscoring the need for proper documentation to convey rights. [4000137270006][4000137270007] - The matter was remanded to avoid commenting on ownership, since ownership is pending before the Civil Court. [4000137270014]

What is the requirement for lawful and duly stamped and registered documents for mutation of entries in revenue records under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code?

What are the consequences of mutating entries without proper documentary support or prior intimation to the Talathi?

How does the judgment treat the presumptive value of entries in the record of rights and the binding effect of registered documents in mutation proceedings?