IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
D.K. Deshmukh, J.
In the matter of Scheme of Amalgamation of ICICI Limited
Company Petition No. 132 of 2002 with Company Application No. 606 of 2001, decided on 11-4-2002.
Advocates appeared :
Virendra V. Tulzapurkar with R.M. Kadam S.H. Parikh i/b. Amarchand Mangaldas Suresh A. Shroff Co., for petitioner.
T.R. Andhyarujina, Sr.C. i/b. Udwadia Udeshi Berjis, for Reserve Bank of India.
C.J. Joy with M.M. Goswami, Panel Counsel i/b. R.P. Singh, Company Prosecutor for Regional Director, Department of Company affairs, Maharashtra, Mumbai.
B.I. Meena, Official Liquidator present.
M.S. Karnik, for Provident Fund Commissioner.
G.S. Reddy, intervenor in person.
Hiren Vyas, intervenor in person.
Janak Mathuradas, intervenor in person.
Aspi Bhesania, intervenor in person.
Tushar Bhavsar i/b. Ramesh Makhija Co., for Asean Development Bank.
Companies Act - Amalgamation Scheme - Sections 391 to 394
Fact of the Case:
The petition was filed under the provisions of sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction for the arrangement embodied in the scheme of amalgamation of the petitioner/company with I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited. The scheme involved transfer of shares, issuance of new shares, and approval of the Reserve Bank of India.
Finding of the Court:
The overwhelming majority of shareholders approved the scheme, and objections raised regarding share exchange ratio were dismissed. The Reserve Bank of India's report supported the fair exchange ratio arrived at by the valuers. The Court found no justification for withholding its sanction.
Issues: Approval of amalgamation scheme, objections raised by shareholders, valuation of share exchange ratio, jurisdiction of the Court, and compliance with Companies Act provisions.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court's obligation is to ensure that the valuation was in accordance with law and carried out by an independent body. Unless objectors prove that the valuation arrived at is grossly unfair, the Court will not withhold its sanction.
Final Decision: The petition was made absolute, and costs were awarded to the Regional Director and Official Liquidator. The request for stay of the order was rejected.
2. The transferee company was incorporated on 5th January, 1994 as a public limited company under the Companies Act, 1956. The transferee company was originally incorporated as I.C.I.C.I. Banking Corporation Limited and its name was changed to I.C.I.C.I. Bank Limited on 10th September, 1999. The registered office of the transferee Company is situate at Landmark, Race Course Circle, Vadodara 390 007, Gujarat.
The present authorised share capital of the transferee company is Rs. 300,00,00,000 divided into 300,000,000 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each. The issued, subscribed and paid up capital is Rs. 220,35,86,800 divided into 220,358,680 equity shares of Rs. 10/- each.
3. The petitioner has specified in the petition in detail the circumstances and the reasons that have necessitated the scheme and the advantages of the Amalgamation Scheme.
4. It is pointed out by the petitioner that when the transferee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.