SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 1107

J.G.CHITRE
Sadashiv Mahadeo Kumbhar – Appellant
Versus
Balkrishna Bhikaji Walimbe & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - J.G. CHITRE, J.:---The petitioner is hereby assailing correctness, propriety and legality of the judgment and order, dated 11-6-1987 passed by the Member, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Pune in the matter of MRT-NS-VII-10/86 (TNC.B 23/85), Pune whereby the learned member confirmed the order passed by Sub-Divisional Officer, Satara in Tenancy Appeal No. 34/2982 by holding that in view of the provisions of section 32-G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 the landlord is also entitled to move an application for reviewing the order passed by the Tribunal in view of section 32-G more particularly sub-section (3) of B.T. A.L. Act.

2. The facts need to be stated for unfolding the matter. Proceedings under section 32-G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (hereinafter referred to as Act for convenience) started in respect of Suit Survey No. 121/3, 121/4 of Village Kumte, Taluka Satara, District Satara before Additional Tahasildar and A.L.T. who passed his final order in those proceedings on 30th of December, 1981 and decided that the suit land was to be sold to the tenant Sadashiv Mahadev Kumbhar after fixing the purchase price of Rs. 2900/-. On the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top