SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 980

V.C.DAGA
Prashant Vagaskar & others – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - V.C. DAGA, J. :---Heard learned Counsel for the parties. Perused record and proceedings. This appeal is directed against a judgment and decree passed by the Bombay City Civil Court, Mumbai on 30-8-2001, in L.C. Suit No. 6306/1984, whereby the suit has been dismissed under Order 15, Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure ('C.P.C.' for short). The parties hereinafter, shall be referred to as arrayed in the original suit.

BACKGROUND FACTS

The facts necessary to appreciate rival contentions may be stated briefly:

2. The appellants/original plaintiffs, claiming to be the monthly tenants of respondent Nos. 2 and 3 (original defendant No. 2), in respect of the suit property, since prior to 1962, filed a suit on 31-8-1984 mainly against the defendant No. 1, challenging the notices issued under section 351 of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1988 ('Act' for the sake of brevity), directing removal and/or demolition of unauthorised structures alleged to have been constructed by the plaintiffs.

In the aforesaid suit, plaintiffs were protected by an ad-interim order of injunction till the dismissal of suit on 30-8-2001. If one turns to the order sheets of the suit, it would be clea


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top