SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 462

R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Vithal Yadav Mhase – Appellant
Versus
Amdar Balasaheb Thorat Nagari Sahakari Path Sanstha Maryadit through its Administrator – Respondent


JUDGMENT - R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.:---Heard the learned Advocates for the parties. Perused the records.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith by consent.

3. The petitioner challenges the orders passed by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sangamner on 31-1-2001 in the proceedings initiated by the respondents for recovery of loan amount. Undisputedly, the recovery was in pursuance of the certificate issued under section 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. The said certificates were not issued in terms of the provisions of section 98-A of the said Act though it was sought to be contended before the Civil Court that the said certificates were issued in terms of the said provision of the law. Undisputedly, there was no order either by the Official Assignee under section 21-A or by the Registrar under section 88 or by the Co-operative Court under section 95 or 98 or in appeal under section 105 or under section 154 of the said Act so as to classify the said certificates to be the certificates issued in terms of the provisions of section 98 of the said Act. Undisputedly, the said certificates were issued on application by the respondents and in accordance with the prov



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top