SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 634

A.S.AGUIAR
Mauvin Godinho – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.S. AGUIAR, J.:---Rule. By consent of the parties, taken up for hearing forthwith. Learned Advocate General waives service for the State/respondent.

2. By this petition, (originally filed as Criminal Revision Application), the petitioner seeks quashing and setting aside of the order dated 18-4-2001 of the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Panaji permitting the respondent to re-investigate the case being Crime No. 106/98, registered against the petitioner and another for the offences under sections 177, 182, 403, 409, 463 read with section 34 of the I.P.C. and sections 7, 9, 10, 11, 13 and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The said order has been passed on the application dated 16-4-2001 of the Addl. S.P. CID/Crime Branch, Panaji. By the said application, the Investigating Officer requested the Court to reopen the case for the purpose of re-investigation on the ground that the earlier closure report was submitted on the mistaken interpretation/assumption of the validity of the Notification dated 1-8-1996 which the complainant had claimed to be illegal in the FIR filed by him. The learned Magistrate being of the view that fresh material was placed befor

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top