SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 287

D.G.KARNIK
Bhagwat Sojanaji Sonawane & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.G. KARNIK, J.:---The respondent No. 2 the Multipurpose Society registered under the provisions of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act is neither a specified society nor a notified society. Despite the term of the previous Managing Committee being over, no elections were held and, therefore the Registrar appointed respondent No. 4 as an Election Officer for holding the elections of the Managing Committee of the respondent No. 2-Society. Accordingly the elections were held on or about 24th June, 1998.

2. The learned Advocate for the petitioners states that no election rules framed under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act or the Rules framed thereunder in respect of societies which are not specified or notified societies. The procedure of election is governed by the bye-laws of the respective societies, as in the case of respondent No. 2.

3. The petitioners were elected members of the Managing Committee in the election held on 24th June, 1998. They had formed a panel and requested the Election Officer to allot them a common symbol. There were in all eleven vacancies which were divided into five groups/categories. Category No. 1 consisted of the borrower members o
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top