JUDGMENT - F.I. REBELLO, J.:---The petitioner was served summons under sections 160 and 91 of the Criminal Procedure Code by respondent No. 1. Petitioner has been filed to challenge the summons. By way of reliefs the petitioner has prayed for issuance of writ of certiorari and any other appropriate writ, order or direction to stay the proceedings initiated by respondent Nos. 1 and 2 against the petitioner on the basis of C.R. No. 156 of 2001. There are also some other consequential reliefs. Respondent No. 1 had on 4-1-2000 registered C.R. No. 156/2001 against one Ajay Thakkar and Smt. Bhavana Thakkar. The case being C.R. No. 33/2001 was being investigated under sections 406, 420 and 114 of Indian Penal Code read with sections 3 and 4 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors Act, 1999. It transpires that in the course of investigation Ajay Thakkar expired. The respondent No. 1 registered the offence on the strength of oral complaint made by one Shri Ajit Vithal Pangam whose statement was also recorded. It is averred in the petition that the statement of Ajit Vithal Pangam recorded by respondent No. 1 based on which C.R. No. 156/2001 was registered clearly and conclusi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document