SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 44

D.D.SINHA
Pralhad Vithal Giri & another – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - D.D. SINHA, J.:---Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of parties.

2. Criminal Application No. 1600 of 2001 under section 482, read with section 167(2), Criminal Procedure Code, is directed against the order, dated 18-9-2001, passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Risod, as well as the order, dated 17-10-2001, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, whereby the application moved by the applicants for grant of bail under section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code came to be dismissed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class and the order of rejection came to be confirmed by the Additional Sessions Judge.

3. Mr. Mardikar, learned Counsel for the applicants, contended that the present applicants are father-in-law and mother-in-law of deceased Pooja, who was alleged to have committed suicide by jumping into a well. The applicants came to be arrested on 16-7-2001. Offence under section 306, Indian Penal Code, i.e., abetment of suicide, punishable with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable for fine. The learned Counsel contended that in view of section 167(2)(a)(ii), Criminal Pro













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top