JUDGMENT - R.J. KOCHAR, J.:---Heard the learned Counsel of all the parties.

2. Rule. To be heard forthwith by consent of the parties as the petition can be disposed of at this stage itself.

3. The petitioner company is aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order dated 25-2-2002 passed by the learned member of the Industrial Court in Complaint U.L.P. No. 1087 of 1996 filed by 10 employees of the petitioner company, respondent Nos. 1 to 10 herein, under Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as the MRTU PULP Act). It is held by the learned member of the Industrial Court that the petitioner company has engaged in an unfair labour practice within the meaning of Item 9 of Schedule IV of the Act and has directed it to cease permanently from continuing to engage in the unfair labour practice and directed to pay the arrears of wages and benefits to be calculated in the terms of the settlement dated 30th December, 1989 between the petitioner company and the Mumbai Muzdoor Sabha the recognised Union respondent No. 11, without obtaining any declaration from them. The Industrial Court f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document