SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 374

NARESH H.PATIL, C.K.THAKKER, B.H.MARLAPALLE
Suryakant Sheshrao Panchal – Appellant
Versus
Vasantrao Naik Vimukta Jati Bhatakya Jamati Aadarsh Prasarak Mandal & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - B.H. MARLAPALLE, J.:---While hearing Writ Petition No. 526 of 2002. The learned Single Judge (Coram: A.B. Naik, J.), by referring to the earlier two decisions rendered by two different Division Benches of this Court observed that both the decisions were at variance with each other on the same point and therefore, on 7-2-2002 he passed an order of reference under Rule 7 of Chapter I of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, for placing the matter before His Lordship The Chief Justice for his considerations to refer the issues to a Bench of two Judges.

2. At the first instance, Writ Petition No. 526 of 2002 came to be placed before the Division Bench consisting of C.K. Thakker, C.J., and B.H. Marlapalle, J. By order dated 15-3-2002, the said Division Bench directed the matter to be placed before a Full Bench.

3. Writ Petition No. 1573 of 1999 was also placed alongwith Writ Petition No. 526 of 2002 before the Full Bench as admittedly the same issues in controversy are also involved in the said writ petition.

4. Writ Petition No. 1573 of 1999 has been admitted on 21-9-1999 and it is ready for final hearing. We, therefore, proceed to decide the issues under referen















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top