SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 Supreme(Bom) 897

G.D.PATIL, A.M.KHANWILKAR
State of Maharashtra – Appellant
Versus
Pandit Maruti Chougule @ Bavadekar – Respondent


JUDGMENT - A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.:---This appeal under section 378(1) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 is directed against the judgment and order dated 19-4-1985 passed by the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kolhapur in Sessions Case No. 22 of 1984 acquitting the respondent of the charge under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The respondent was charged that on 28-12-1982 between 8.00 p.m. and 9.00 in the vernadah of Jeevan Shikshan Vidya Mandir at Masud Male Tahsil Panhala committed rape on Akkatai d/o Keraba Bavadekar alias Chaugule and thereby committed an offence punishable under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution story as unfolded in the first information report (FIR) (Exh. 7) is that on 28-12-1982 Anubai Bavadekar, the complainant (P.W. 1) had returned to her house in the evening and asked her daughter Akkatai, the prosecutrix (P.W. 5) to go to the house of Babutai Gawali (P.W. 6) to collect the sale proceeds of the milk which was sold by her to Babutai. It is stated that at around 7.30 p.m. Akkatai went to the house of Babutai to collect the sale proceeds of the milk and returned home at about 9.30 p.m. and on returning home Akkatai straightway went to














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top