SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2001 Supreme(Bom) 591

VISHNU SAHAI, A.S.BAGGA
Mahadeo Kundalik Vaidya & others – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT - VISHNU SAHAI, J.:---Through this appeal, the appellants challenge the judgment and order dated 22nd March, 1996 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, in Sessions Case No. 30/1995, whereby they have been convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/- each, in default to undergo R.I. for one year, for the offence punishable under section 302 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. In short, the prosecution case runs as under.

The four appellants are brothers inter se and are nephews of the deceased Dattarao. Their father, Kundalik, was Dattarao's brother. There was bad blood between the appellants and the deceased on account of partition of agricultural lands. A day before the incident, i.e. 10-6-1994, all the four appellants took mango fruits from a tree situated on the common bond of the agricultural lands belonging to the appellants and the deceased. The same evening when the deceased returned from the weekly market, his son, Prakash, P.W. 4, informed him about this.

On 11-6-1994, at about 9-9.15 a.m., Sharda, P.W. 2 and her sister Kalindi, P.W. 3 (the daughters of the deceased), along with the deceased














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top