JUDGMENT - R.M.S. KHANDEPARKAR, J.:---Heard the learned Advocates for the petitioner and the respondent No. 1. None present for the respondent No. 2, though served. The notice was specifically issued to the respondents for final disposal of the matter and accordingly when the matter was taken up for final hearing on Monday last, by consent the same was adjourned for final hearing today, and accordingly the Advocates for the petitioner and the respondent No. 1 were heard. Perused the records.

2. The petitioners challenge the order dated 8th August, 2001, passed in Special Civil Suit No. 200 of 2000 under Exhibit 35-A by the trial Court. By the impugned order, the trial Court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner for extension of time to deposit the amount which the petitioner was required to deposit under the decree dated 6th July, 2001 in the said suit consequent to the suit for specific performance of the agreement between the parties having been decreed in favour of the petitioner.

3. The facts, in brief, relevant for the decision in the matter are that the petitioner herein filed the said suit for specific performance of the agreement between the parties in relat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document