SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 441

C.K.THAKKER, S.RADHAKRISHNAN
Medley Laboratories (P. ) Ltd. & another – Appellant
Versus
Alkem Laboratories Limited – Respondent


JUDGMENT - C.K. THAKKER, C.J.:---This appeal is instituted against an order passed by the learned Single Judge on December 21, 2001 in Notice of Motion No. 1790 of 2001. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge rejected the application for ad interim relief filed by the appellants-applicants-plaintiffs. So far as the motion was concerned, it was made returnable after six weeks, and was ordered to be placed on Board on its own turn.

2. The appellants are the original plaintiffs. Suit No. 2597 of 2001 was filed by the plaintiffs against the defendant for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from infringing their registered trade mark SPOXIN. It was the case of the plaintiffs that in April, 1984, plaintiff No. 1 applied for and obtained Trade Mark SPOXIN which was registered in Part A of the Register vide No. 420835 in respect of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Preparations in Class 5. The registration certificate was issued, and was renewed from time to time. It was also the say of the plaintiffs that they started using the said Trade Mark SPOXIN, exercising control over the quality of the medicines and pharmaceutical preparations manufactured by them. The mark has been
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top