SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Bom) 296

J.A.PATIL
Boots Company PLC & another – Appellant
Versus
Registrar of Trade Marks & another – Respondent


JUDGMENT - J.A. PATIL, J.:---This is an appeal under section 109 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958 (for short, the Act, 1958) challenging the order dated 27-3-1998 passed by the Assistant Registrar of Trade Marks allowing the application of the respondent No. 2 for registration of a trade mark of 'CROFEN' and rejecting the opposition filed by the petitioners. The relevant facts in brief are as under.

2. The petitioner No. 1 is a company incorporated and registered under the laws of England carrying on business inter alia of manufacturing and marketing medicinal and pharmaceutical preparations throughout the world. The petitioner No. 1 was the owner of the trade mark "BRUFEN" as on 25-7-1968, registered under No. 2506671 in Class 5 of Schedule IV of the Act, 1958. The petitioner No. 2 is a company incorporated and registered under laws of Germany also carrying on business inter alia of manufacturing and marketing pharmaceutical products. By a deed of assignment dated 9th August, 1995, the petitioner No. 1 has assigned some of its trade marks including the trade mark of "BRUFEN" to petitioner No. 2 and the said Deed of assignment has been filed with the Registrar of Trade M































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top