JUDGMENT - CHITRE J.G., J.:---The appellants are assailing the correctness, propriety and legality of the order passed by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No. 539 of 1993 wherein appellant Navin Purushottam Shetty has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to undergo S.I. for 7 days for the offence punishable under section 392 of I.P.C. He has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 7 years for the offence punishable under the provisions of section 397 of I.P.C. He has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- in default S.I. for 3 days. Appellant Bhaskar Virappa Kanchan has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 4 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default to undergo S.I. for 7 days for the offence punishable under section 392 of I.P.C. He has been sentenced to undergo R.I. for 2 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- in default S.I. for 3 days for the offence punishable under section 452 of I.P.C.

2. These two appellants were tried before the trial Court mentioned above along with other three co-accused, namely, Ejaj Badshah Shaikh, Rashid @ Mamit Abdul Majid Ansair and Sayy

Click Here to Read the rest of this document