R.S.MOHITE
Prakash Ramrao Kute – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
2. The prosecution case was that the accused was working as a Canal Inspector. On 3-1-1996 he had measured the land of the accused situated in village Vakapur. The measurement was required to be done in connection with a complaint that the complainant Sudhakar Wankhede had taken the canal water. After taking the measurement, on 19-1-1996 the accused had met the complainant Sudhakar and told him that, Saaheb had called him. On 23-1-96 the complainant visited the office alongwith one Prabhakar Wankhede. The appellant met him and told him that he had prepared the panchanama of his field and that the complainant would have to pay Rs. 300/- and if he failed to pay Rs. 300/-, then he would have to pay Rs. 900/- as fine which was three times the amou
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.