SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Bom) 275

J.G.CHITRE
Perswami Kandswami Devendra & another – Appellant
Versus
Senior Inspector of Police & others – Respondent


JUDGMENT - CHITRE J.G., J.:---Heard. The petitioners who happen to be father and son are hereby assailing the propriety, legality and correctness of the show cause notice issued by the Special Executive Magistrate, Matunga Region, Mumbai issued to them in view of provisions of section 111 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "Code" for convenience) for taking the action in view of provisions of section 107 of the Code.

2. The case revolves around a dispute between Annna Durai Perswami Devendra and his wife mainly Perswami Kandswami, father of Anna Durai has come in picture as there has been an allegation against him that he was also illtreating his daughter-in-law. Both Anna Durai and Kandswami are facing a trial for committing an offence punishable under section 498-A of I.P.C. on the same allegation. In addition to that, it has been alleged in the said notice that on 10-1-1998 after getting released on bail both of them threatened the wife of Anna Durai that they would take the revenge as she filed a case against them in the Court.

3. Shri Naik submitted that the object of action to be taken in view of sections 107 and 111 of the Code is for preventing t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top